Mengenali Potensi: Asesmen Psikologi Bakat, Minat, dan Kepribadian untuk Pengembangan Potensi Siswa di SD Ciherang, Jawa Barat

Reza Fahlevi - Universitas Tarumanagara
Zamralita Zamralita - Universitas Tarumanagara
Debora Basaria - Universitas Tarumanagara
Fransisca Dewi - Universitas Tarumanagara
Philomena Widyastuti - Universitas Tarumanagara
Raissa Valentine - Universitas Tarumanagara

Abstract


Improving the quality of primary education in under-resourced areas such as Ciherang Village, West Java, remains challenging due to limited facilities, guidance, and access to structured psychological assessments. This community engagement program aimed to help students at SD Ciherang recognize their cognitive abilities, interests, and personality traits through a systematic assessment. A total of 53 sixth-grade students participated in three instruments: Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) for cognitive ability, SDS Holland for career interests, and the Big Five Inventory (BFI) for personality traits. The program was implemented using a Community-Based Research (CBR) approach that actively involved teachers and Thematic Community Service (KKNT) students. The results showed that most students had good to very good cognitive abilities. Their dominant interests were Artistic and Social, indicating a strong preference for creativity and social interaction. Personality profiles were primarily characterized by Agreeableness and Extraversion, reflecting cooperative, empathetic, and sociable tendencies. These findings highlight the need for extracurricular programs focusing on arts, social engagement, and leadership, as well as structured activities to develop discipline and self-management skills. This initiative provides tangible contributions in the form of tailored recommendations for extracurricular development based on students’ profiles and offers psychological data as a foundation for school policy planning. The approach is expected to enhance educational services and support the optimal development of students’ potential.

ABSTRAK

Peningkatan kualitas pendidikan dasar di daerah terbatas seperti Desa Ciherang, Jawa Barat, sering terhambat keterbatasan fasilitas, bimbingan, dan asesmen psikologis yang memadai. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan membantu siswa SD Ciherang mengenali potensi kognitif, minat, dan kepribadian melalui asesmen terstruktur. Sebanyak 53 siswa kelas VI mengikuti tiga instrumen: Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices (CPM) untuk kemampuan kognitif, SDS Holland untuk minat karier, dan Big Five Inventory (BFI) untuk kepribadian. Pelaksanaan program menggunakan pendekatan Community-Based Research (CBR) yang melibatkan guru dan mahasiswa KKNT secara aktif. Hasil menunjukkan mayoritas siswa memiliki kemampuan kognitif baik–sangat baik. Minat dominan pada Artistic dan Social, menunjukkan ketertarikan tinggi pada kreativitas dan interaksi sosial, sementara kepribadian siswa didominasi Agreeableness dan Extraversion, yang menggambarkan sifat ramah, kooperatif, dan mudah bersosialisasi. Temuan ini mengindikasikan perlunya pengembangan program ekstrakurikuler seni, sosial, dan kepemimpinan, sekaligus membiasakan kegiatan yang melatih disiplin dan manajemen diri. Kegiatan ini memberikan kontribusi nyata berupa rekomendasi pengembangan program ekstrakurikuler berbasis profil siswa dan menyediakan data profil psikologis sebagai dasar kebijakan sekolah. Pendekatan ini diharapkan meningkatkan layanan pendidikan dan mendukung pengembangan potensi siswa secara optimal.


Keywords


Psychological assessment Talents and interests, Big Five Inventory (BFI) SDS Holland, Primary education / Asesmen psikologi Bakat dan minat, Big Five Inventory (BFI), SDS Holland, Pendidikan dasar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, J., & Robbins, S. (2010). Effects of interest–major congruence, motivation, and academic performance on timely degree attainment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017267

Algan, Y., Beasley, E., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R. (2014). The impact of non-cognitive skills training on academic and non-academic trajectories: From childhood to early adulthood. Diakses dari https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03429906/

Aprilyani, R., Fahlevi, R., Nurlina, N., Wulandari, R., Nurhidayatullah, N., & Pranajaya, S. A. (2023). Psikologi perkembangan peserta didik. Padang: Get Press Indonesia.

Arta, G. Y. (2024). Asesmen dalam pendidikan: Konsep, pendekatan, prinsip, jenis, dan fungsi. Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Budaya, 3(3), 170–190. https://doi.org/10.55606/jpbb.v3i3.3925

Astuti, B., & Purwanta, M. S. P. D. E. (2020). Bimbingan karier untuk meningkatkan kesiapan karier. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Assouline, S. G., Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., & Colangelo, N. (2017). Academic acceleration is an effective intervention for high ability students. Dalam C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (hlm. 166). New York: Routledge.

Ayriza, Y., Triyanto, A., Setiawati, F. A., & Gunawan, N. E. (2020). Exploring children's career interests and knowledge based on Holland's theory. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13440a

Baeten, M., Dochy, F., & Struyven, K. (2013). The effects of different learning environments on students’ motivation for learning and their achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02076.x

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Dahl, R. E., Allen, N. B., Wilbrecht, L., & Suleiman, A. B. (2018). Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature, 554(7693), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25770

Dewi, E. M. P., Qamaria, R. S., Widiastuti, A. A., Widyatno, A., Marpaung, J., Ervina, I., & Suprihatin, T. (2024). Pendidikan Indonesia di era globalisasi: Tantangan dan peluang. Jakarta: Nas Media Pustaka.

Erikson, E. (1959). Theory of identity development. Dalam E. Erikson (Ed.), Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press.

Estiana, R., Sambodja, E., Sobali, U., & Nasril, N. (2024). Pendampingan untuk mengenali dan mengembangkan potensi diri pada generasi alpha melalui pendekatan talents mapping. Jurnal Abdimas PIJ, 4(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.34127/japlj.v4i2.1403

Feher, A., & Vernon, P. A. (2021). Looking beyond the Big Five: A selective review of alternatives to the Big Five model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 110002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110002

Halim, L., Abd Rahman, N., Zamri, R., & Mohtar, L. (2018). The roles of parents in cultivating children's interest towards science learning and careers. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.05.001

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Humairah, I., Reihannah, R., Fitriana, D. D., & Safitri, R. (2024). Model pendidikan minat bakat melalui self-efficacy di sekolah. Nidhomiyyah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.38073/nidhomiyyah.v5i2.1659

Isma, A. (2023). Peta permasalahan pendidikan abad 21 di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Terapan, 1(3), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.61255/jupiter.v1i3.153

Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (2018). Critical issues in developing and following CBPR principles. Dalam N. Wallerstein et al. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Jones, K. S., Newman, D. A., Su, R., & Rounds, J. (2022). Vocational interests and adverse impact: How attraction and selection on vocational interests relate to adverse impact potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(4), 604. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000893

Lippa, R. A. (2010). Gender differences in personality and interests: When, where, and why? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(11), 1098–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17519004.2010.00320

Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2010). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Nikel, ?. (2022). The Big Five personality traits and school achievements of children: The role of gender. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 27(4), 71–84.https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879pr.22.025.18084

Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2024). Where are we now with the implementation of the talent development framework for gifted students and where do we go in the future? Education Sciences, 14(9), 932. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090932

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014996

Raven, J. C. (2000). The Raven's Progressive Matrices: A review of normative data. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 253–265.

Samuels, M. T. (2014). The boy who could: How the education system creates inferiority complexes in students. Pacifica, CA: Pacifica Graduate Institute.

Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional, multiplicative, and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00110

Sumilat, J. M., & Geor, G. (2024). Pendidikan berbasis kurikulum merdeka di tingkat sekolah dasar: Menggali potensi anak untuk masa depan yang lebih unggul. Journal of Syntax Literate, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v9i7.16382

Usslepp, N., Hübner, N., Stoll, G., Spengler, M., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2020). RIASEC interests and the Big Five personality traits matter for life success—But do they already matter for educational track choices? Journal of Personality, 88(5), 1007–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12547

van Aswegen, E. C., & Pendergast, D. (2023). The impact of interest: An emergent model of interest development in the early years. Early Child Development and Care, 193(13–14), 1335–1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2023.2245575

Vedel, A., & Poropat, A. E. (2017). Personality and academic performance. Dalam V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (hlm. 1–9). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_989-1

Widiansyah, A. (2018). Peranan sumber daya pendidikan sebagai faktor penentu dalam manajemen sistem pendidikan. Cakrawala: Jurnal Humaniora, 18(2), 229–234. https://doi.org/10.31294/jc.v18i2.4347




DOI: https://doi.org/10.59818/jpm.v5i4.1899