Transformasi Kompetensi Peneliti Melalui Penerapan AI Qwen 2.5 dalam Pelatihan Penulisan Manuskrip Ilmiah Kualitatif
Abstract
The training program "Writing Qualitative Manuscripts Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Qwen 2.5" served as a strategic initiative to develop digital academic competencies. Employing an interactive and practical approach, it introduced Qwen 2.5 as a generative AI tool to support the writing, analysis, and refinement of qualitative manuscripts. Using a closed questionnaire, the evaluation revealed a high level of participant satisfaction. Most participants affirmed the content's relevance and the effectiveness of the delivery methods. These findings confirm Qwen 2.5's potential in accelerating academic writing while fostering ethical awareness in AI usage within research contexts.
ABSTRAK
Pelatihan "Menulis Manuskrip Kualitatif dengan Bantuan Artificial Intelligence (AI) – Qwen 2.5" merupakan program strategis dalam memperkuat keterampilan digital akademik. Kegiatan ini memanfaatkan pendekatan interaktif untuk mengenalkan Qwen 2.5 sebagai alat bantu dalam penyusunan, analisis, dan penyempurnaan manuskrip ilmiah. Evaluasi pelatihan dilakukan dengan kuesioner tertutup dan hasilnya menunjukkan tingkat kepuasan yang tinggi. Mayoritas peserta menilai bahwa materi pelatihan relevan dan metode penyampaian efektif. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa Qwen 2.5 dapat mempercepat proses penulisan tanpa mengabaikan kualitas akademik, sekaligus mendorong refleksi etis terhadap penggunaan AI dalam ranah ilmiah.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajalo, E., Yusuf, I., & Lamidi, A. (2025). Navigating the ethical concerns of AI in higher education: Insights from faculty reflections. International Journal of Educational Technology and Ethics, 12(1), 45–63.
AlMoghrabi, T., Nordin, N., & Rahmat, A. (2021). Descriptive analysis in educational research: Applications and implications. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 11(3), 22–30.
Baghdadi, N., El Sherif, D., & Kassem, H. (2024). Reframing qualitative inquiry in the age of AI: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 27(1), 1–13.
Bearman, M., Luckin, R., & Salas, H. (2022). AI in qualitative research: Thematic tools and epistemological tensions. Qualitative Inquiry, 28(6), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004211003233
Bravo, C., Neira, M., & Thomas, J. (2022). AI and digital literacy in higher education: Emerging curriculum frameworks. Educational Review, 74(5), 745–764.
Chen, Y., Zhang, M., & Liu, H. (2022). The role of self-efficacy and satisfaction in AI-supported learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(6), 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1821714
Cohn, M., Reynolds, B., & Yilmaz, G. (2024). Designing meaningful online AI-based writing instruction: A community of inquiry perspective. Journal of Online Learning Research, 10(1), 1–21.
Dai, Y., Li, F., & Sun, W. (2020). Iterative evaluation in AI education training: A longitudinal study. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 260–272.
Dizon, G., & Gayed, R. (2021). AI-powered writing assistants and academic integrity: Opportunities and threats. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1453–1470. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211028933
Ghazali, M., Zulkifli, R., & Kamaruddin, K. (2018). Human versus machine in thematic coding: An epistemological reflection. Asian Journal of Qualitative Research, 5(1), 31–48.
Gobin, V., Choo, E., & Araujo, R. (2025). Pedagogical integration of AI in academic writing: Challenges and insights from faculty development programs. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(2), 210–227.
Graham, P., Moore, A., & Knox, J. (2019). Ethics of automation in higher education: Critical engagement with AI tools. AI & Society, 34(4), 823–834.
Hale, J., Bryant, K., & Al-Salman, S. (2024). Teaching critical AI literacy: Addressing bias and transparency in algorithmic writing. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 16(1), 55–70.
Hassan, A., Widodo, S., & Kurniawan, H. (2022). Responsible use of AI in education: Frameworks and challenges. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(5), 1479–1496.
Hitch, R. (2023). Infrastructure and ethics in AI-based research training. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00356-8
Ke, L., Munandar, H., & Jones, T. (2021). The limits of automation in qualitative analysis: Maintaining researcher reflexivity. Qualitative Social Research, 22(2), Art. 7.
Lainjo, B., & Tmouche, R. (2024). Generative AI in qualitative research: From assistance to co-analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–13.
Lee, J., Choi, Y., & Tan, S. (2024). Survey analysis in AI education: Insights from student feedback. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(2), 33–50.
Malerbi, D., Huang, J., & Omar, A. (2023). Simulation-based training in AI literacy programs: A review. Computers & Education, 194, 104663.
Maphoto, S., Dube, M., & Madlala, T. (2024). Upholding academic integrity in the age of AI writing tools. South African Journal of Higher Education, 38(1), 155–174.
Marshall, L. (2024). Interpreting AI in qualitative analysis: The role of critical epistemology. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 12(3), 112–129.
Ongena, G., Verschaeve, S., & Meijer, S. (2019). Democratizing data science: Can AI improve access to qualitative analysis? Technology in Society, 56, 119–127.
Park, J., Liu, R., & Amin, N. (2022). Rethinking validity and scale in qualitative research using AI. International Review of Qualitative Research, 15(1), 44–67.
ROA, T., & Halim, F. (2024). Enhancing writing quality with AI support: A comparative study. Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 81–94.
Savardi, F., Vitale, R., & Giacomelli, L. (2025). Designing reliable instruments for evaluating AI-assisted academic training. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(1), 63–81.
Schmitt, D. (2023). The rise of AI in academic writing: Enhancing research or eroding authenticity? Studies in Higher Education, 48(6), 987–1002.
Shen, J., Chan, W. M., & Goh, C. (2019). Student satisfaction in blended learning: Intersections with technology acceptance. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 80–91.
Sugianti, R. (2024). Strategi pelatihan metodologi berbantuan AI bagi peneliti pemula. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 9(1), 33–49.
Su, Y., & Yang, Y. (2023). Measuring knowledge retention in AI-assisted learning contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 561–581.
Sun, L., de Jong, F., & Iskandar, S. (2025). Multi-dimensional assessment of AI writing training: A validation study. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 44(2), 105–119.
Thalib, A. (2022). Efektivitas pelatihan metodologi penelitian berbasis teknologi digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi, 18(2), 77–88.
Till, K., Wahyuni, S., & Doyle, E. (2024). Active learning in AI workshops: Simulation vs theory. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 32(1), 14–28.
Towler, M. (2023). Developing academic writing with AI: Pedagogical implications for researchers. Journal of Academic Writing and Technology, 11(2), 91–107.
Tubino, C., & Adachi, A. (2022). Continuous feedback models for AI-based education programs. Journal of Learning Sciences and Technology, 7(4), 205–223.
Yang, C., & Kyun, H. (2022). ADDIE-based design for AI-integrated instruction. Instructional Science, 50(3), 621–645.
Yang?, N., Erdogan, S., & Mutlu, A. (2025). Bridging theory and application in AI training through practice-based learning. Journal of Educational Innovation and Practice, 19(1), 41–59.
Zaheer, N., Kumar, D., & Khan, A. (2025). Faculty readiness and challenges in adopting AI in teaching. International Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(1), 55–72.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59818/jpm.v5i4.1823



