DINAMIKA HISTORIS PEMUKIMAN KOMUNITAS BUGIS DI HOLTEKAMP, KOTA JAYAPURA

Muhammad Aqil - Univesrsitas Cenderawasih
Megiridha Loppies - Univesrsitas Cenderawasih

Abstract


Bugis migration has helped shape the multiethnic character of Jayapura City, including Kampung Holtekamp, known as "Kampung Bugis" although it administratively remains part of Holtekamp, yet historical studies on it remain limited. This study aims to identify the factors driving Bugis migration, the formation of settlement patterns, the community's socio-economic role, and its social interaction with the local community. The study employs a descriptive-analytical historical method (heuristics, source criticism, interpretation, historiography) using interview, literature review, and documentation data. Results show the Bugis arrival occurred in two phases, from fishpond labor mobility before 1996 to permanent settlement through kinship networks, forming the "Kampung Bugis" identity reinforced by bonding-bridging social capital, livelihood diversification, religious tolerance, and interethnic marriage, even as the Bugis language declines among younger generations. It is concluded that Bugis settlement in Holtekamp is a historical-relational process reflecting cultural continuity alongside socio-economic adaptation.

 

ABSTRAK

Migrasi Bugis turut membentuk karakter multietnis Kota Jayapura, termasuk di Kampung Holtekamp yang dikenal sebagai "Kampung Bugis" meski administratif tetap bagian dari Holtekamp, namun kajian historisnya masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi faktor migrasi Bugis, pembentukan pola permukiman, peran sosial-ekonomi komunitas, serta interaksi sosialnya dengan masyarakat lokal. Penelitian menggunakan metode sejarah deskriptif-analitis (heuristik, kritik sumber, interpretasi, historiografi) dengan data wawancara, studi pustaka, dan dokumentasi. Hasil menunjukkan kedatangan Bugis berlangsung dua fase, dari mobilitas kerja tambak sebelum 1996 menuju permukiman menetap melalui jaringan kekerabatan, membentuk identitas "Kampung Bugis" yang diperkuat modal sosial bonding-bridging, diversifikasi mata pencaharian, toleransi beragama, dan perkawinan antaretnis, meski bahasa Bugis menurun pada generasi muda. Disimpulkan bahwa pemukiman Bugis di Holtekamp merupakan proses historis-relasional yang memperlihatkan keberlanjutan identitas budaya sekaligus adaptasi sosial-ekonomi.


Keywords


Bugis Community, Migration History, Coastal Settlements, Social Adaptation, Holtekamp Village ; Komunitas Bugis, Sejarah migrasi, Pemukiman pesisir, Adaptasi sosial, Kampung Holtekamp

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andreas, A. (2014). Karakteristik Lingkungan dan Perilaku Masyarakat Kawasan Permukiman Nelayan di sekitar Teluk Kendari (Studi Kasus: Keseluruhan Punggaloba dan keseluruhan Benua-Benua). 89–98.

Baharuddin, A. (2017). Hollandia Haven–Hollandia Binnen: Two Historic Towns in Jayapura City. TAWARIKH. 8(April), 143–152.

Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–34.

Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. Oxford university press.

Griffiths, C. E. (2022). Strangers in our midst: Immigration, social capital and segmented conflict. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 22(4), 559–580. (https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895820986226)

Hakim, L., Murdi, L., Amar, S., & Hadi, M. S. (2024). Bugis migration to Labuhan Lombok: Social-economic adaptation and maritime transformation. Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah dan Pendidikan. 8(3), 478–490.

John W. Bennett. (1976). The Ecological Transition: Cultural Anthropology and Human Adaptation. Pergamon Press Inc.

Kaddi, S. M., & Dewi, R. S. (2017). Sipakatau, sipakainge, sipakalebbi, sipattokong (Studi komunikasi antarbudaya perantau Bugis di Kota Palu, Sulawesi Tengah). Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Komunikasi. 01(01), 347–357.

Kambu, D., Musfira, M., & Yanthy, N. O. (2022). Pengaruh peningkatan aktivitas pemanfaatan ruang terhadap kondisi ekonomi dan sosial masyarakat lokal di kampung holtekamp distrik muara tami kota jayapura. Jurnal MEDIAN Arsitektur Dan Planologi, 12(01), 26–32.

Koentjaraningrat, P. I. A., & Pembangunan, M. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. In Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Kuntowijoyo. (2003). Metodologi Sejarah. tiara wacana.

Lefebvre. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell.

Lineton, J. (1975). Pasompe’Ugi’: Bugis migrants and wanderers. Archipel, 10(1), 173-201.

Lüthi, B. (2018). Migration and Migration History.” Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte, Version (http://docupedia.de/zg/Luethi_migration_v2_en_2018)

Maiti, S. N., Pakrashi, D., Saha, S., & Smyth, R. (2022). Don’t judge a book by its cover: The role of intergroup contact in reducing prejudice in conflict settings. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 202, 533–548.

Mukrimin. (2019). “ Moving the Kitchen out ”: Contemporary Bugis Migration.Southeast Asian Studies. 8(3), 349–368.

Naa, J. R., Lamba, M. A., Ramandei, L., & Tommi, T. (2024). Implementasi rencana tata ruang wilayah Kota Jayapura terhadap peruntukan lahan di Holtekamp Distrik Muara Tami. Konstruksi: Publikasi Ilmu Teknik, Perencanaan Tata Ruang dan Teknik Sipil. 2(4).

Nelmawarni. (2021). Streotip Suku Bugis Dalam persfektif sejarah Majalah Ilmiah Tabuah: Ta’limat Budaya, Agama dan Humaniora. 49–57.

Novriawati, E., & Nasrudin, R. (2023). Does migration network matter in driving internal migration in Indonesia ?Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan. 24(October). (https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.v24i2.19280)

Padiatra, A. M. (2020). Ilmu sejarah : metode dan praktik. JSI Press.

Pelras, C. (1996). The Bugis. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

RPJMD Distrik M. Tami. (2014). Sejarah Kampung Holtekamp. Pemerintah Kelurahan Koya Barat. (https://pemerintahkelurahankoyabarat.blogspot.com/2014/02/sejarah-kampung-holtekamp.html)

Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper 72). Institute of Development Studies.

Song, M. (2009). Is intermarriage a good indicator of integration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(2), 331–348.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sukardi, S., Wildan, M. & Badrun, B. (2026). Cultural construction of religious tolerance in urban socio-cultural change: Evidence from Salatiga, Indonesia. LITE: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya 21 (2). 483–494.

Wekke, I. S., Ibrahim, I., Syaifuddin, E. R., Rasid, R., & Riswandi, A. (2025). Semiotika budaya: Perjumpaan masyarakat Bugis di Tanah Papua. ResearchGate. (https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15779.98082)].

Wekke, I. S. (2017). Migrasi Bugis dan Madura di Selatan Papua Barat: Perjumpaan Etnis dan Agama di Minoritas Muslim. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains, 6(2), 163–180.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v5i3.3317

Citation Format:

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Office Address

Jl. Adi Flora Raya, Cluster Magnolia Xiana No 27, Komplek Bumi Adipura, Kec. Gede Bage, Kota Bandung.

Phone: (022) 873 553 70 | Mobile: +62 81 57000 699

Payment Information

Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI)
Account Name: CV. Widina Media Utama
Account Number: 110701000573565

SINTA Index Google Scholar Garuda Index Crossref BASE Index Dimensions