PERAN SELF EFFICACY DALAM MEMEDIASI PENGARUH DUKUNGAN ORGANISASI TERHADAP TECHNOSTRESS GURU SMA DI MAKASSAR

Windasari Windasari - Universitas Negeri Makassar
Lukman Nadjamuddin - Universitas Negeri Makassar
M. Ahkam Alwi - Universitas Negeri Makassar

Abstract


Rapid technological integration in education often triggers psychological pressure among teachers, known as technostress. This study examines the mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between Perceived Organizational Support (POS) and technostress. Using a quantitative survey design, data were collected from 180 public high school teachers in Makassar through cluster random sampling. Instruments included the Technostress Scale, POS Scale, and Self-Efficacy Scale, with mediation analysis performed using Hayes’ PROCESS Model 4. The results indicate that self-efficacy fully mediates the relationship between POS and technostress ($b = -0.1024, 95\% \text{ CI } [-0.1797, -0.0414]$). Higher POS enhances teachers' self-efficacy, which in turn significantly reduces technostress levels. These findings highlight self-efficacy as a crucial psychological mechanism in managing digital adaptation. This study contributes to the literature on teacher well-being by emphasizing the importance of organizational support in fostering digital competence confidence.

 

ABSTRAK

Integrasi teknologi yang masif dalam dunia pendidikan sering kali memicu tekanan psikologis pada guru yang dikenal sebagai technostress. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji peran self-efficacy sebagai mediator dalam hubungan antara Perceived Organizational Support (POS) dan technostress. Menggunakan desain survei kuantitatif, data dikumpulkan dari 180 guru SMA Negeri di Makassar melalui teknik cluster random sampling. Instrumen penelitian meliputi Skala Technostress, Skala POS, dan Skala Self-Efficacy, yang dianalisis menggunakan Hayes’ PROCESS Model 4. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa self-efficacy berperan sebagai mediator penuh dalam hubungan antara POS dan technostress ($b = -0,1024, 95\% \text{ CI } [-0,1797, -0,0414]$). Dukungan organisasi yang dirasakan guru mampu meningkatkan self-efficacy, yang kemudian berdampak signifikan pada penurunan technostress. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa self-efficacy merupakan mekanisme psikologis kunci dalam moderasi dampak adaptasi digital. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada kajian kesejahteraan guru dengan menekankan pentingnya dukungan institusional untuk membangun kepercayaan diri dalam kompetensi digital.


Keywords


Technostress, Perceived Organizational Support, dan Self Efficacy ;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ardiantoro, L., Rudiyanto, M. A., Muslimin, M., & Ria S, F. (2024). Platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM) untuk meningkatkan disiplin perceived organizational supportitif bagi guru penggerak di Mojokerto. Abdimas Nusantara: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.36815/abdimasnusantara.v6i1.3353

Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.2190/JGJR-0KVL-HRF7-GCNV

Çoklar, A. N., Efilti, E., ?ahin, Y. L., & Akçay, A. (2016). Investigation of techno-stress levels of teachers who were included in technology integration processes. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1331–1339.

Dolighan, T., & Owen, M. (2021). Teacher efficacy for online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brock Education Journal, 30(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v30i1.851

Donkoh, S. (2023). Sources of self-efficacy and their implications on science teacher education. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(9), 447–459. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i9.5002

Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In Theories of Organizational Stress (pp. 28–67). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198522799.003.0003

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

Eisenberger, R., Rhoades Shanock, L., & Wen, X. (2020). Perceived organizational support: Why caring about employees counts. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-044917

El-Saka, S. F., Elmetwaly, M. M., Elsherbeny, E. E., El-Khawaga, G. O., & El-Helaly, M. (2024). Technostress among university medical staff members: A cross-sectional study. Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine, 48(3), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejom.2024.276646.1331

Fadhil Zil Ikram, Anaguna, N., & Rosidah. (2023). The impact of real action features in the Merdeka Mengajar Platform (PMM): Mathematics teacher’s perspective. MaPan, 11(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2023v11n2a1

García, P. S., Urbano, R. L., & Castelao, S. R. (2021). Consequences of COVID-19 confinement for teachers: Family-work interactions, technostress, and perceived organizational support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111259

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546

Haeri, I. Z., & Afriansyah, A. (2024). Eksplorasi beban digital guru: Survei pemanfaatan Platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM) oleh guru. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v15i2.4615

Jamal, A., Yaqoob, S., Hussain, T., & Alam, H. (2023). Impact of perceived organizational support on innovative work behavior and burnout in teachers. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 10(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v10i2.815

Jufri, A., & Harfiani, R. (2024). Dampak pembelajaran lintas jurusan pada program PMM-MBKM. Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i1.814

Karimawati, R., Budi, T., & Radikun, S. (2024). Peran occupational self-efficacy sebagai moderator pada hubungan antara persepsi dampak perubahan dan job crafting. Jurnal Psikologi, 5(3), 1058–1067.

Khan, A. A., Shahzad, S., & Gull, H. (2022). Effect of techno-stress on the work behavior of university teachers. Global Educational Studies Review, 7(2), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-ii).40

Kim, D. G., & Lee, C. W. (2021). Exploring the roles of self-efficacy and technical support in the relationship between techno-stress and counter-productivity. Sustainability, 13(8), 4349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084349

Kotek, M. (2022). Exploring the antecedents of technostress at work: A meta-analysis. Research Square, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1701358/v1

Li, L., Kanchanapoom, K., Deeprasert, J., Duan, N., & Qi, Z. (2025). Unveiling the factors shaping teacher job performance. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02324-1

Magistra, S. N., Santosa, S., & Indriayu, M. (2021). Effect of self-efficacy and technostress on teacher performance through organizational commitments. Dinamika Pendidikan, 16(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v16i1.28993

Mubaroq, M. A., & Ilham, M. F. (2023). Peran teknologi dalam peningkatan dan efektivitas proses pembelajaran. MASALIQ, 3(4), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.58578/masaliq.v3i4.1209

Muhibbin, M. A., Wibowo, D. S., Gifari, M. S. A., & Sari, N. K. (2025). Bridging organizational support and teacher self-efficacy. Journal An-Nafs, 10(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v10i1.7284

Nagy, J. T., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2024). Factors influencing university teachers’ technological integration. Education Sciences, 14(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010055

Puspitasari, L., & Zumrotun, E. (2024). Analisis pemanfaatan aplikasi Platform Merdeka Mengajar (PMM). School Education Journal PGSD FIP UNIMED, 14(2), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.24114/sejpgsd.v14i2.59289

Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165

Rosyada, A., Syahada, P., & Chanifudin, C. (2024). Kurikulum merdeka dan beban administrasi guru. Jurnal Inovasi, Evaluasi dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiepp.v4i2.491

Saidy, J., Garanti, Z., & Sadaka, R. (2022). Technostress creators and job performance among frontliners. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 827027. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827027

Saleem, F., & Malik, M. I. (2023). Technostress, quality of work life, and job performance. Behavioral Sciences, 13(12), 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13121014

Salsabila, U. H., Ilmi, M. U., Aisyah, S., Nurfadila, N., & Saputra, R. (2021). Peran teknologi pendidikan di era disrupsi. Journal on Education, 3(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v3i01.348

Salsinha, C. N., et al. (2024). Optimalisasi pemanfaatan Platform Merdeka Mengajar. Jurnal Abdi Insani, 11(1), 588–597. https://doi.org/10.29303/abdiinsani.v11i1.1290

Solís, P., Lago-Urbano, R., & Real Castelao, S. (2023). Factors impacting technostress in teachers. Behavioral Sciences, 13(5), 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050364

Suryarini, D. Y., & Bahtiar, R. S. (2018). The effect of microteaching on self-efficacy. Inovasi, 20(2), 83–94.

Syahriani, S., Purwanto, A., & Budi, S. (2023). Problems of teachers using independent teaching platforms. Edumaspul, 7(2), 5490–5495. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.7359

Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. (2019). The technostress trifecta. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109

Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. S. (2011). Crossing to the dark side. Communications of the ACM, 54(9), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1995376.1995403

Urukovi?ová, N., et al. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Technostress Creators Inventory. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100324

Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Navigating technostress in primary schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1267767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1267767

Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. The Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/258173




DOI: https://doi.org/10.59818/jpi.v5i6.2474