Focus and Scope

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia: Teori, Penelitian dan Inovasi (Indonesian Education Journal: Theory, Research and Innovation) As a journal (e-ISSN: 2807-3878) it is a multi-disciplinary journal, peer-referenced, the scope of this journal is:

1. Learning & Teaching
2. Curiculum Development
3. Teacher Education
4. Educational Technology
5. Educational Development
6. Educational Policy
7. Education & Counseling
8. Education Management
9. Religious Education

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Seminar Nasional FKIP Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia: Teori, Penelitian dan Inovasi  applies a double-blind review process. Authors are welcome to suggest at least three potential reviewers along with their names and email addresses. However, the decision to determine the right reviewer is the right of the editor. Gallery proof of approved manuscripts will be viewed online as early as possible upon receipt of the author and final proofreading by the editor-in-chief.

Plagiarism and self-plagiarism are not allowed. Software tools can be used so that submitted articles are screened for plagiarism. Overlapping and similar text detection is used there so citations and matched quotes should be used whenever needed. Basically the author's job is only to submit manuscripts that are free from plagiarism and academic malpractice. Editors, however, double-check each article before publication. The first step is to check for plagiarism against the offline database by the Editorial Board of the Journal of Community Service: Empowerment, Innovation and Change and, secondly, against as many online databases as possible.

Publication Frequency

The Indonesian Education Journal (Theory, Research and Innovation) is published 6 times a year, including: July, September, November, January, March and May.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that makes research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

Publication Ethics

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia: Teori, Penelitian dan Inovasi (Indonesian Education Journal: Theory, Research and Innovation), e-ISSN 2807-3878 (Online), is a peer-reviewed journal published by CV Widina Media Utama Publishing. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of posting an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewed and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore essential to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society.

CV Widina Media Utama Publishing as the publisher of Jurnal Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing exceptionally seriously, and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or additional commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Besides, CV Widina Media Utama, and the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should publish. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also help the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument reported should be accompanied by the appropriate citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works and if the authors have used the works or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same paper concurrently to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Article Processing Charges

The journal charges only article processing charge of Rp. 500.000 (Indonesia Author) or Rp. 0 (International Author + Indonesia Author, International Author). This charge is applied only after a submission is accepted.

Author should understand that willingness to pay does not guarantee the acceptance of a submission.